Radiohead 'Just' from Tony Kearns on Vimeo.
The music
video for ‘Just’ by Radiohead uses a linear narrative which can be examined
using Todorov’s concept for narrative. It uses a linear 3 act structure, act 1
the equilibrium is where the main character takes a bath then sets off for his
walk, and we are introduced to the bands performance. This is followed by a
disruption and an enigma code, when the character lays on the pavement in the
street and people start crowding round him wanting to find out why, this is the
disequilibrium. Act three the new equilibrium comes into play as the rest of
the characters join the main character on the floor. This is a subtle
resolution to the problem as it is not a clear resolution, yet all the characters
become calm in comparison to the previous act meaning that the problem is
solved for the characters but not the audience. This conventional linear
narrative and anticipation by using an enigma code provides a way of
understanding the narrative structure of the video, because it drives the
storyline, encouraging the audience to want to see the ending. I would argue
that the ambiguous ending challenges ideological closure, we don’t find out
what the main character said and why they are all laying on the pavement.
Therefore the closure is disrupted and the artists are establishing their brand
as mysterious and arty for their audience, and rebelling against the norm,
differentiating themselves from other similar artists and constructing the
bands motif.
However
outside of this linear narrative, there are indications of a parallel/interweaving
narrative of the performance side versus the narrative story. A framing device
that is a window connects these because the performers occasionally look out of
this and watch the man on the pavement, interweaving the performance and
narrative story together, even though they don’t actually interact with each
other.
Devices
used like the enigma code previously mentioned capture the audience’s attention
because they want to see why the man is on the floor, a conclusion to this
action code. This acts as a catalyst and gets perpetuated when the ideological
closure is disrupted by everyone else joining the main character on the floor
and the camera pans out so we can fully see, followed by the ending of the
video. This proairetic code makes the audience want to see the ending but we
don’t get any closure, the audience are also unable to prefigure what would
happen next because of the little context given about the situation. As I have
previously mentioned this creates a mysterious and arty brand for the artists. Additionally
another narrative device used is that it’s in real time and that it’s in
chronological order, this adds to the anticipation that the enigma code uses
because the audience feel like something important could and should happen at
any time, however much to the audiences’ disappointment we don’t have any
closure.
The framing
device of a window separates the performers and the characters, alongside the
fact that the performers are several floors up on a building looking out of
this window. Creating a slight conflict/binary opposition between the artists
and the characters. When people start crowding round the man on the floor we
see that the band have stopped performing and are all looking out the window,
which evokes the notion of looking for the audience. Reinforcing the bands motif I previously
talked about because the audience are encouraged to look down at the
characters. These characters are all dressed in business suits, have respect
for the law/hierarchy because of their polite interactions with the police
officer, and the location is a modern urban area. So characters could act as
symbolic codes for capitalist western ideologies. So to reinforce the artist’s
rebellion, the audience are positioned with them to look at the characters on
floor and think of how silly and stupid they are behaving, while they are
juxtaposed in a grungy looking room, and their costumes are more casual and
less luxurious. Therefore this framing device could be used to present to the
audience the artists ideologies and despise for capitalist western cultures,
and get the audience to also feel this.